Fierce Creatures (1997) -

The film serves as a biting parody of Rupert Murdoch-style corporate takeovers. Roger Ebert noted that Cleese essentially channels his "Fawlty Towers" energy into the role of the stressed-out Rollo.

Naturally, the zookeepers—led by the ever-stuttering (Michael Palin)—rebel, leading to a series of chaotic misunderstandings involving fake gunshots, animatronic pandas, and Kevin Kline playing dual roles as both the tycoon and his dim-witted son, Vince. Why It Works (And Why It’s Underappreciated)

Called it a "funny idea" and appreciated the satirical jabs at media gluttony. Fierce Creatures (1997)

Writers at MovieRob and Interjected argue that while it may not be as "clever" as A Fish Called Wanda , its sheer absurdity makes it a "wunderkind" of physical comedy.

The main draw is seeing the "Wanda" cast play entirely different dynamics. According to reviewers on Mutant Reviewers , the chemistry remains electric, even if the script is a bit loopier. The film serves as a biting parody of

The plot kicks off when a ruthless media tycoon, (Kevin Kline), acquires the Marwood Zoo and demands a 20% profit margin. To hit this goal, the new director, Rollo Lee (John Cleese), institutes a "Fierce Creatures" policy: only dangerous, man-killing animals are allowed to stay, while the harmless ones are ordered to be put down.

Elements of the script actually date back to a 1967 concept co-written by Terry Jones and Michael Palin , giving it a classic British slapstick feel. What the Critics Say Why It Works (And Why It’s Underappreciated) Called

Highlights the movie as a satire on corporate greed but notes some "adult" humor and double entendres.